Sep. 3rd, 2014

defrog: (Default)
Drive-by news analysis from Team Frog Batshit Political Curator Lucky Bensonhurst

ITEM: Finally, something Democrat and Republican voters can agree on: they both hate Congressional Republicans.

That’s according to a poll from Quinnipiac University, which found that, overall, the majority of Republicans polled (56%) disapprove of their own party in Congress. Democrats, by contrast, are more overwhelmingly supportive of Congressional Democrats (63%).

More details at HuffPo.

We all know about polls, of course (though this is an academic poll, not an online Fox News poll, but still, polls eh?). But the results aren't really that surprising. Establishment Republicans running for Congress this year have been fighting off Tea Party challengers. And while many of the establishment candidates have been successful, some have lost. And pretty much all of my Republican colleagues tended to back the Tea Party person for the usual reason – namely, the Establishment GOP is too fucking liberal for them. They want Real Conservatives who will stand up to the tyranny of Lord Obama, not these pansy bleeding-heart moderates who talk about weak bullshit like compromise. FUCK COMPROMISE, JIM! OBAMA IS TOO DANGEROUS FOR COMPROMISE! NEVER GIVE IN! Et cetera.

Yes. Ha ha.

So in terms of approval/disapproval, it’s no surprise the GOP is getting hammered from their own side.

For the liberals tempted to make serious hay of this and predict the Democrats are going to kick ass in November, sorry kids, but no. They don’t stand a chance in the House this year and their odds of keeping the Senate are slim. The meaningful takeaway here is that the Tea Party still has a lot of clout, and isn’t going to go away quietly like John Boehner was perhaps hoping they would.

Which, ironically, is bad news for the GOP in the longer term, according to John A. Tures, political science professor at LaGrange College in Georgia, because polls also suggest that the Tea Party’s hardcore policies are not really very popular:

But long term, this isn't a positive sign for the GOP for two reasons. First, they are likely to interpret their 2014 electoral victories as a sign that they are loved by the people, and will stay the course. Second, as demographics continue to take their course, the Republicans will fall further behind. The policies, such as their hard line on immigration, will only get worse.

Perhaps. On the other hand, that also assumes that Republican voters who prefer an establishment candidate would rather vote Demo than vote for a Tea Party Republican. I’m not too convinced of that. Tures does say “long term”, but that could mean anywhere from four to 40 years. Given both current demographic realities and the prospect of President Hillary Clinton in 2016 – and Hillary can expect the same amount of cooperation from a GOP-controlled House and/or Senate that Glorious Leader Obama is getting now (which is to say, none whatsoever) – Repub voters will probably stick to the GOP for at least the next decade no matter how batshit they become. Better a dysfunctional batshit democracy than a Socialist dictatorship, eh Ted?

Either way, it does indicate weird times ahead for the GOP. It will spend the next few election cycles at war with itself and – I suspect – adopting more unpopular positions that they’ll back as long as it doesn’t hurt their overall election chances, if only because of voter inertia. In which case the GOP could possibly* go down in American history as the most successful political party with the lowest approval ratings ever.

*PRODUCTION NOTE: I say “possibly” because I’m not sure what the current record is for party wins vs approval ratings. It’s worth remembering too that the Demos’ approval ratings aren’t exactly stellar right now (though they’re still higher than the GOP). Still.

– L. Bensonhurst
defrog: (Default)
There is trouble in Hong Kong.

The problem goes something like this:

We do not have universal suffrage when it comes to choosing a Chief Executive (CE). We have been promised by Beijing that at some point we can have universal suffrage as soon as they think we’re ready to have it. That time is theoretically 2017 (around ten years after the last time Beijing said we could have it, then decided we weren’t “ready”).

The past year has seen a lot of debate over how to implement universal suffrage in 2017, with several proposals being kicked around. This week, Beijing’s National People’s Congress (NPC) effectively picked one for us: we all get to vote for the next CE, but we don’t get to actually nominate who gets to run for CE. That will be determined by a “nominating committee” of 1,200 people who will, theoretically, represent all groups in HK, but in practice will pretty much nominate only candidates that Beijing likes.

That way, no matter who loses, Beijing wins.

The pan-democratic parties (i.e. political parties that have been pushing hard for democracy) find this unacceptable, not least because one of the criteria for nomination is being a “patriotic” person who “loves Hong Kong”. Which is as ominous as it sounds when Beijing is the one deciding who is patriotic and who isn’t.

And so now the showdown is about to begin. Possibly.

Activist groups have organized on both sides of the debate. Occupy Central opposes the NPC-approved framework and plans to shut down the Central business district with massive sit-in protests until the HK Govt approves a framework allowing the people to nominate their own candidates. Anti-Occupy groups like Alliance for Peace and Democracy argue that if we don’t take this deal, we’re not going to make any progress on universal suffrage for at least another decade, if ever.

That’s certainly how the HK Govt has been framing it with a PSA that suggest if Occupy Central goes ahead, the deal is off and we get nothing (and you can blame them gawdamn Occupy protesters for that). The HK Govt has also said that the planned Occupy Central protest would be illegal anyway, and they’re not in the business of negotiating with lawbreakers. So there.

What happens from here is a big question mark, if only because Occupy Central leader Benny Chan has already admitted support for his group has dwindled following the NPC decision (although he’s since backtracked and said the people backing out due to “pragmatism” will be replaced by unpragmatic college students pissed off about the decision, so game on).

So if Occupy Central goes ahead, it’s either going to be a poor turnout, or a bigger and much angrier turnout.

In which case this probably isn’t going to end well.

TL;DR )

I could be wrong. I have a feeling we're going to find out. 

Developing ....

The revolution starts soon,

This is dF

Profile

defrog: (Default)
defrog

May 2025

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 07:10 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios