Odds are by now you’ve come across the book
50 Shades Of Grey in yr local bookstore – or, failing that, you’ve come across some TV news stories or Facebook posts or something about the book. In which case you probably know three things about it:
(1) It’s got lotsa BDSM sex in it
(2) It’s poorly written
(3) It’s insanely popular, despite (1).
Much has been written about it primarily because of points (1) and (3), and most of it because an awful lot of people can’t get their heads around the idea that women not only like porn (OMG!), but BDSM porn (ZOMFG!).
Also, because of its apparent popularity with a particular female demo, they’re calling it
“mommy porn” (which is both sensationalistic and a bit creepy-sounding).
I’m writing about it partly because it’s been popping up on bookshelves in Asia (I can personally confirm that the whole series is available in major bookstores in Hong Kong, Bangkok and Kuala Lumpur) and partly because of all the dithering it’s inspired.
Newsweek did a
cover story on it (with a
poorly conceived feminism spin)!
Libraries are
refusing to carry it!
Actual BDSM practitioners are
concerned over inaccuracies!
Gilbert Gottfried is
reading it out loud on the Internet!
The library angle is the most interesting to me – it’s not often you see libraries refusing to stock certain books before uppity parents and Christian groups get a chance to demand they remove them. Of course, the difference is that librarians aren’t obliged to carry something just because there’s demand for it. Also, anti-censorship people can point to
Lolita and
Lady Chatterly’s Lover all they want – comparing E.L. James to Nabokov or Lawrence is like comparing Dan Brown to Grahame Greene.
However, it’s a fair bet that some libraries are probably more worried about the sexy bits than the writing quality. Which raises the broader question of where does one draw the line between erotica and porn, whether there should be a line at all, and whether libraries should have a section for it.
Personally, I think they should. I think erotica is as valid a genre and a cultural signpost as techno-thrillers and urban fantasy. And as Annie Sprinkles once said (I think – or possibly it was Suzie Bright), the difference between “erotica” and “porn” is the difference between whether you order wine or beer with your meal in a fancy restaurant.
So why not carry
50SoG? Some have argued that “if it gets more people to go to the library and/or read books, do it”. To which I would add: If gets more people to read erotica/porn, go for it.
DISCLAIMER: I haven’t read
50SoG, no. And I don’t plan to. From what I’ve read, it sounds like an overhyped romance novel with a BDSM angle.
More to the point, my experience with erotica is that even when it’s by someone who knows how to write, it falls short of my expectations in terms of both sexiness and narrative.
Which is why I started writing my own, of course.
Everything went grey,
This is dF